UGFH 1000 與人文對話 In Dialogue with Humanity

Course Code	UGFH 1000 UGFH1000			科目名稱		與人文對話 In Dialogue with Humanity
教員	Dr. YEUNG Choi Kit [官方介紹] [學術著作]			學　　分		3學分
課程性質	大學通識基礎			同科其他選擇		Dr WONG Baldwin Bon Wah Dr LEUNG Cheuk Hang Dr LI Chun Hong Dr KWOK Pak Nin Dr. LUI Wing Sing Dr. WONG Wing Yu Esther Dr. FONG Sing Ha Dr. CHIU Chu Lee Dr. LO Chun Yeung  Mr. LI Chi Tat Dr. YEUNG Tak Lap Dr. LAU Po Hei Dr. CHENG Wai Pang
Workload	PAPER TUTORIAL / PRESENTATION 3次quiz 2篇RJ								好重
									重	2
									平均	5
									輕
									極輕
評價教學內容	#1本身就有啲悶。RJ要自己諗題目，同埋要係教嗰課tutorial 前交。不跟次序教，好難去到peer #2 課程整體來說是想學生多方面思考的，有宗教，有政治，有哲學，但一星期一篇，有點多 #3 Dr Yeung only requires us to read part of the article, not the whole #4 如果只針對課程内容，當成係聼故仔都幾好咖！ #5 對於理科同學較爲沉悶，文章較多較長。 #6 內容有趣，個個都要讀，無話深唔深 Dr　因為最近香港嘅反送中運動，特登將Section 3 政治哲學調上嚟教先，所以同社會好有關係。 #7  paper有下限無上限，然後每次RJ都寫過三千 cls。上堂一定要講嘢，講廢話都好，如果唔係差成一個半嘅grade
評價教員教學	#1 Overall有趣 #2 老師教書是有heart的，有條理，看得出有準備。她好像是今年才來，當然有改善的地方，但看得出她堂堂都有俾心機備課，帶學生跟她的思路去討論的。學生又可以先把功課寄電郵給她，她會先改一次，給意見讓學生改善，所以功課的grade最後都幾好，又學到野 #3 Kind and friendly, the quiz was hard, but overall good grade #4 算係Killer，亂俾分，RJ就算寫成點都可以俾個好低嘅分。佢唔likey你就唔好指意B+以上。（上佢嘅堂好努力RJ又認真寫但係兩分RJ都淨係俾個B我，又冇解釋到底邊度有錯。） #5 老師準備充足，但是對世界的看法帶有一些偏見。 課程中不時出現明顯的引導式討論，有待完善。 部分RJ的評分建基于課文文本就是真理的假設上，看法不同的文章評分較低。 沒有跟正常的次序教授課程，對文本的理解或會構成問題。 #6 Dr. Yeung好有Heart 教書，睇得出每堂都有準備，有上堂積極問問題都會靚Grade 交RJ前可以比佢改一次先，對Year 1　FMBB好有幫助！ 停課嘅時候都成日關心學生，係一個好老師 #7 自己有自己個套，你一提出自己嘅諗法就會反駁你。上堂講嘢尚算清晰，唔算話太悶。同埋每堂tut嘅筆記都有RJ題目，如果頭幾堂撞正鍾意寫嘅，可以即刻落筆寫。不過成日教唔切交RJ/Paper前個一兩課，自己睇路。Paper方面，一定一定一定要俾Sabrina睇一次個draft, otherwise一定爛grade。
CUSIS科目資料	Description： The course invites students to investigate the problem of "humanity"—i.e., what it means to be human—at two levels: human as an individual and human as a social being. Students will be engaged in a direct dialogue with literary writers, philosophers and social reformers who address three fundamental questions: What is it that makes a "good" life for me? What is it that makes a "good" society for everyone? How do I make possible such a "good" life and "good" society? Students are expected to read, discuss, and write about a wide range of texts extracted from influential classics in the humanities East and West. They will be   encouraged to discover their own answers to the three questions by considering views and arguments expressed in the texts, and by exploring how far and in what ways such views and arguments may hold true for the contemporary world. Where appropriate, the selected classic texts will be given bilingually to help students enter the world of classics and develop confidence and competence in approaching primary texts. Students will meet for one lecture and two tutorial sessions every week. Emphasis will be placed on students’ capacity to respond critically to the selected texts in oral and written presentations, in the form of class discussions, short write-ups and term papers. Class size will be kept small to maximize discussions and to facilitate intensive guidance on academic writing, in Chinese and/or English as specified by the instructor. Learning Outcome： By the end of the course, students should be able to: 1. articulate effectively views about good life and good society in class and in academic essays; 2. demonstrate enhanced confidence in reading and discussing complicated texts from the humanities and social sciences; 3. evaluate the soundness of different approaches to good life and good society from multiple perspectives; 4. comment on the relevance of arguments and views expressed in the selected texts to contemporary human conditions; and 5. develop informed personal views on desirable life and ideal society
其他資料	2018Sem1：學位 100|註冊 90|剩餘 10 2018Sem2：學位 150|註冊 93|剩餘 57 2019Sem1：學位 150|註冊 145|剩餘 5 2019Sem2：學位 150|註冊 138|剩餘 12
同學推薦	高度推薦	3	推薦		1	有保留	2	極有保留			1